Kaelon Black
San Francisco 49ers · RB
Next: vs Las Vegas Raiders,
?
The share of his team’s offensive plays he was in for, over his last two games.▲ His role has grown lately: more time on the field than his season average.
Quick read
- Las Vegas Raiders allow the most rushing yards to running backs: a soft matchup.
This week vs Las Vegas Raiders
· SF favored by 9.5 · SF expected to score 29 · total 48.5
LV allow 124.9 rushing yards a game to running backs, 32nd fewest of 32. #32 A soft matchup for Kaelon Black.
Ranks run 1 to 32: 1st is the toughest defense, 32nd the softest. Full matchup
How often he clears 24.5 rushing yards
Over 24.5, a number just under his recent middle. Pro lets you check any number, Overs or Unders, and filter by home, away or opponent.
His playing time has changed lately. “His current role” counts only games where he played about as much as in his last two.
- Last 52 of 5 (40%)
- Last 104 of 7 (57%)
- Latest season4 of 7 (57%)
- His current role2 of 2 (100%)
- vs LVno games
- Home2 of 4 (50%)
- Away2 of 3 (67%)
Past games only, oldest on the left, the week or date under each bar; faded bars are last season. How often a player cleared a number is useful context, not a prediction.
Game log
| Week | Opponent | Result | On field | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Carries | Rushing yards | Touchdowns | Wiped by flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | @ ATL | L 20-29 | 47% | 3 | 1 | -4 | 12 | 63 | 1 | |
| 6 | vs WAS | W 23-17 | 23% | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 0 | |
| 5 | @ SEA | W 32-29 | 18% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 0 | |
| 4 | vs DEN | W 24-14 | 26% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 13 | 0 | |
| 3 | vs ARI | W 36-30 | 15% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | |
| 2 | vs MIA | W 35-13 | 33% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 25 | 0 | 14 rush yds |
| 1 | @ LA | W 27-7 | 43% | 1 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 65 | 0 |
“On field” is the share of his team’s offensive plays he was in for. “Wiped by flags” is what he gained on plays his own team’s penalties cancelled.
Check a number
Type any number to see the chance Kaelon Black gets more than it against LV.