Olamide Zaccheaus
Atlanta Falcons · WR
Next: at Tampa Bay Buccaneers,
?
Of all the passes his team threw at a receiver lately, the share thrown to him.?
The share of his team’s offensive plays he was in for, over his last two games.▲ His role has grown lately: more time on the field than his season average.
This week @ Tampa Bay Buccaneers
· TB favored by 2.5 · ATL expected to score 20.5 · total 43.5
TB allow 134.7 receiving yards a game to wide receivers, 10th fewest of 32. #10 A tough matchup for Olamide Zaccheaus.
Ranks run 1 to 32: 1st is the toughest defense, 32nd the softest. Full matchup
How often he clears 1.5 receiving yards
Over 1.5, a number just under his recent middle. Pro lets you check any number, Overs or Unders, and filter by home, away or opponent.
His playing time has changed lately. “His current role” counts only games where he played about as much as in his last two.
- Last 52 of 5 (40%)
- Last 105 of 10 (50%)
- Latest season3 of 6 (50%)
- His current role4 of 6 (67%)
- vs TBno games
- Home7 of 11 (64%)
- Away9 of 11 (82%)
Past games only, oldest on the left, the week or date under each bar; faded bars are last season. How often a player cleared a number is useful context, not a prediction.
Game log
| Week | Opponent | Result | On field | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Carries | Rushing yards | Touchdowns | Wiped by flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | vs CHI | L 23-31 | 55% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | vs BAL | L 23-30 | 33% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | @ NO | W 45-24 | 37% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | @ GB | W 35-14 | 34% | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | vs CAR | L 3-34 | 43% | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | @ PIT | L 13-20 | 30% | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 18 | vs DET | L 16-19 | 11% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 16 | vs GB | W 22-16 | 86% | 5 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 15 | vs CLE | W 31-3 | 82% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 14 | @ GB | L 21-28 | 79% | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2025 wk 13 | @ PHI | W 24-15 | 28% | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 12 | vs PIT | W 31-28 | 35% | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 11 | @ MIN | W 19-17 | 13% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 10 | vs NYG | W 24-20 | 57% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 9 | @ CIN | W 47-42 | 64% | 8 | 6 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2025 wk 8 | @ BAL | L 16-30 | 60% | 7 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 7 | vs NO | W 26-14 | 52% | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 6 | @ WAS | W 25-24 | 84% | 6 | 2 | 24 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 4 | @ LV | W 25-24 | 60% | 6 | 5 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 3 | vs DAL | W 31-14 | 58% | 4 | 3 | 24 | 1 | 12 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 2 | @ DET | L 21-52 | 44% | 5 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 9 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 1 | vs MIN | L 24-27 | 45% | 7 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
“On field” is the share of his team’s offensive plays he was in for. “Wiped by flags” is what he gained on plays his own team’s penalties cancelled.