Colston Loveland
Chicago Bears · TE
Next: at Seattle Seahawks,
?
Of all the passes his team threw at a receiver lately, the share thrown to him.?
The share of his team’s offensive plays he was in for, over his last two games.▲ His role has grown lately: more time on the field than his season average.
Quick read
- Seattle Seahawks allow the 32nd most receiving yards to tight ends: a tough matchup.
- On the field 86% of snaps the last 2 games.
This week @ Seattle Seahawks
· SEA favored by 3 · CHI expected to score 21.8 · total 46.5
SEA allow 34.4 receiving yards a game to tight ends, 1st fewest of 32. #1 A tough matchup for Colston Loveland.
Ranks run 1 to 32: 1st is the toughest defense, 32nd the softest. Full matchup
How often he clears 43.5 receiving yards
Over 43.5, a number just under his recent middle. Pro lets you check any number, Overs or Unders, and filter by home, away or opponent.
- Last 53 of 5 (60%)
- Last 105 of 10 (50%)
- Latest season3 of 7 (43%)
- vs SEAno games
- Home6 of 12 (50%)
- Away3 of 11 (27%)
Past games only, oldest on the left, the week or date under each bar; faded bars are last season. How often a player cleared a number is useful context, not a prediction.
His lines this week
The number each book has posted, the best price for each side, what that price needs to break even, and how often he has cleared the number. Our chance for each side is a Pro column: see plans.
Receptions 4.5 DraftKings
| Side | Best price | Needs | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season | Book says | Our chance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over | +121 DraftKings | 45% | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/7 | 43% | Pro |
| Under | -154 FanDuel | 61% | 2/5 | 5/10 | 4/7 | 57% | Pro |
DraftKings 4.5 (+121 / -155) · FanDuel 4.5 (+116 / -154)
Receiving yards 40.5 Fanatics
| Side | Best price | Needs | Last 5 | Last 10 | Season | Book says | Our chance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over | -135 Fanatics | 57% | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/7 | 53% | Pro |
| Under | 42.5 -114 FanDuel | 53% | 2/5 | 5/10 | 4/7 | 47% | Pro |
DraftKings 41.5 (-111 / -113) · Fanatics 40.5 (-135 / +100) · FanDuel 42.5 (-114 / -114)
Every priced prop on the board · 21+ · Gamble responsibly.
Game log
| Week | Opponent | Result | On field | Targets | Receptions | Receiving yards | Carries | Rushing yards | Touchdowns | Wiped by flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | vs NE | W 30-24 | 84% | 12 | 7 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 6 | @ ATL | W 31-23 | 88% | 7 | 6 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 catch, 10 yds |
| 5 | @ GB | L 7-31 | 80% | 5 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | vs NYJ | W 23-12 | 92% | 9 | 6 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | vs PHI | W 27-7 | 79% | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | vs MIN | L 3-9 | 86% | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 catch, 14 yds |
| 1 | @ CAR | W 59-37 | 87% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 18 | vs DET | L 16-19 | 91% | 13 | 10 | 91 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2025 wk 17 | @ SF | L 38-42 | 82% | 10 | 6 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2025 wk 16 | vs GB | W 22-16 | 83% | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 catch, 8 yds |
| 2025 wk 15 | vs CLE | W 31-3 | 65% | 5 | 4 | 63 | 1 | -2 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 14 | @ GB | L 21-28 | 59% | 5 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2025 wk 13 | @ PHI | W 24-15 | 59% | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 12 | vs PIT | W 31-28 | 65% | 5 | 4 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2025 wk 11 | @ MIN | W 19-17 | 75% | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 10 | vs NYG | W 24-20 | 62% | 4 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 9 | @ CIN | W 47-42 | 81% | 7 | 6 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2025 wk 8 | @ BAL | L 16-30 | 81% | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 7 | vs NO | W 26-14 | 67% | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 6 | @ WAS | W 25-24 | 42% | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 catch, 11 yds |
| 2025 wk 3 | vs DAL | W 31-14 | 10% | 3 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 2 | @ DET | L 21-52 | 53% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2025 wk 1 | vs MIN | L 24-27 | 57% | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
“On field” is the share of his team’s offensive plays he was in for. “Wiped by flags” is what he gained on plays his own team’s penalties cancelled.
Check a number
Type any number to see the chance Colston Loveland gets more than it against SEA.